Join the Discussion

Comments So Far: 6

• 0%

  doppich1 year, 5 months ago

  All those years of Sunday School and Bible School, and I never heard that cool story about baldie, the bears and the 42 kids.

  Reply

  1 Reply

  • HmacComment removed: User banned.
• 100%

  infidell2space1 year, 5 months ago

  Yup, anyone who has evre read the King James bible without their rose colored religious glasses on knows what an silly supperstitious book it is.

  Reply
• 0%

  hsamwilliams1 year, 4 months ago

  One of the things that Atheist use as their main weapon is Sarcasm. I have read and heard some excellent atheistic arguments agains the existence of GOD. But most that I read are more like play ground insults like infidell2space.

  My BA is in History and I have read over 12 versions of the Bible many times. I did not start out as a Christian but was never an atheist. I was agnostic for over 5 years and before that did not care.

  By the way how many Atheists believe in UFO's?

  Reply
• 100%

  bucko1581 year, 2 months ago

  I agree hsamwilliams, sarcasm is used often by internet posting atheists. Its an easy way to make someone else's argument seem silly, without actually making any valid points of you own.

  Reply
• 0%

  darkside2er1 year ago

  I feel the point of this article is to highlight the idiocy of refering to a translated document as the literal word of god. Whilst, assuming that the christian cosmology is accurate, the bible in its original language might have been the literal word of god (in that it is a record of exactly what was said by jesus/god, not that everything must be taken literally), with the repeated historical translation, from hebrew into various languages, with updates to keep it actually readable, errors will have crept in, and those errors will have been compounded by subsequent translations and edits. It is enough to know that their is a "king james version" and a "gideon's bible" to know that no one book can be truly accurate, and that the only way to read it properly is to get as close to the source as possible, and even then we have the problem of a human filter upon the word of god

  Reply