This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Mary was of the house of David, she was royalty. Not a theory, absolute fact. The thought that she would be a prostitute is mildly amusing considering her position in society.
She was demonized just because she was a woman, sort of reminds me of how our media has jumped on Obama boat, and are now throwing stones at Clinton.
Clinton was the presumptive nominee of the Democratic party at the outset, and it was her poor choices for campaign leaders, underestimation of the potential and expertise of Obama and his campaign mangers, penchant for employing dirty tricks when realization and desperation set in, and her attitude of brushing it aside when she used her Bosnia trip to give validity to her level of experience, only to be caught in a lie.
She played into the hysteria over Rev, Wright's 30 second sound bites, but cried foul when Obama made a valid criticism of her health care plan. People became turned off and tuned out to her antics. At one point, I would not have been upset if she were to be the nominee; now, I would hurt me to my heart! She's not worthy.
I believe that he meant to say 47 and that it was a slip of the tongue. However, seeing how the media (and myself) trashed Clinton for her Bosnia remarks, seeing as how ther media and the left have trashed McCains "100 years" remark, and remembering how Dan Quayle was all but crucified for spelling potato "potatoe" (even though it is a correct spelling) I figure that we should not give Barry a pass.
Mary was of the house of David, she was royalty. Not a theory, absolute fact. The thought that she would be a prostitute is mildly amusing considering her position in society.
She was demonized just because she was a woman, sort of reminds me of how our media has jumped on Obama boat, and are now throwing stones at Clinton.
Clinton's gender is a problem for many in both parties.
Clinton was the presumptive nominee of the Democratic party at the outset, and it was her poor choices for campaign leaders, underestimation of the potential and expertise of Obama and his campaign mangers, penchant for employing dirty tricks when realization and desperation set in, and her attitude of brushing it aside when she used her Bosnia trip to give validity to her level of experience, only to be caught in a lie.
She played into the hysteria over Rev, Wright's 30 second sound bites, but cried foul when Obama made a valid criticism of her health care plan. People became turned off and tuned out to her antics. At one point, I would not have been upset if she were to be the nominee; now, I would hurt me to my heart! She's not worthy.
Is her Bosnia trip fiasco any worse than Baracks 57 state comment?
Wouldn't know, haven't heard it, and I would definitely check to verify it, so if you care to share it, also provide the proof.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H7eBTFSv7nE&feat...
I believe that he meant to say 47 and that it was a slip of the tongue. However, seeing how the media (and myself) trashed Clinton for her Bosnia remarks, seeing as how ther media and the left have trashed McCains "100 years" remark, and remembering how Dan Quayle was all but crucified for spelling potato "potatoe" (even though it is a correct spelling) I figure that we should not give Barry a pass.
then how did mary end up with a lower middle class carpenter?
and for hillary, being a woman is the least of her problems. her biggest problem is wreaking of ruthless ambition.